Author(s) -
Ana Sousa,
João Paulo VilasBoas,
Ricardo J. Fernandes
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
biomed research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 126
eISSN - 2314-6141
pISSN - 2314-6133
DOI - 10.1155/2014/675363
Subject(s) - algorithm , computer science
A bioenergetical analysis of swimming at intensities near competitive distances is inexistent. It was aimed to compare the transient VO 2 kinetics responses and metabolic contributions whilst swimming at different velocities around VO 2max . 12 trained male swimmers performed (i) an incremental protocol to determine the velocity at VO 2max (vVO 2max ) and (ii) three square wave exercises from rest to 95, 100, and 105% of vVO 2max . VO 2 was directly measured using a telemetric portable gas analyser and its kinetics analysed through a double-exponential model. Metabolic contributions were assessed through the sum of three energy components. No differences were observed in the fast component response ( τ 1 —15, 18, and 16 s, A 1 —36, 34, and 37 mL · kg −1 · min −1 , and Gain—32, 29, and 30 mL · min −1 at 95, 100, and 105% of the vVO 2max , resp.) but A2 was higher in 95 and 100% compared to 105% intensity (480.76 ± 247.01, 452.18 ± 217.04, and 147.04 ± 60.40 mL · min −1 , resp.). The aerobic energy contribution increased with the time sustained (83 ± 5, 74 ± 6, and 59 ± 7% for 95, 100, and 105%, resp.). The adjustment of the cardiovascular and/or pulmonary systems that determine O 2 delivery and diffusion to the exercising muscles did not change with changing intensity, with the exception of VO 2 slow component kinetics metabolic profiles.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom