Reliability in the Parameterization of the Functional Reach Test in Elderly Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study
Author(s) -
José Antonio Merchán-Baeza,
Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez,
Antonio CuestaVargas
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
biomed research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 126
eISSN - 2314-6141
pISSN - 2314-6133
DOI - 10.1155/2014/637671
Subject(s) - lumbosacral joint , reliability (semiconductor) , angular displacement , trunk , medicine , stroke (engine) , lumbar , displacement (psychology) , physical medicine and rehabilitation , angular acceleration , kinematics , physical therapy , angular velocity , mathematics , surgery , physics , psychology , geometry , ecology , power (physics) , quantum mechanics , classical mechanics , psychotherapist , biology , thermodynamics
Background . Postural instability is one of the major complications found in stroke survivors. Parameterising the functional reach test (FRT) could be useful in clinical practice and basic research. Objectives . To analyse the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity in the FRT parameterisation using inertial sensors for recording kinematic variables in patients who have suffered a stroke. Design . Cross-sectional study. While performing FRT, two inertial sensors were placed on the patient's back (lumbar and trunk). Participants . Five subjects over 65 who suffer from a stroke. Measurements . FRT measures, lumbosacral/thoracic maximum angular displacement, maximum time of lumbosacral/thoracic angular displacement, time return initial position, and total time. Speed and acceleration of the movements were calculated indirectly. Results . FRT measure is 12.75 ± 2.06 cm. Intrasubject reliability values range from 0.829 (time to return initial position (lumbar sensor)) to 0.891 (lumbosacral maximum angular displacement). Intersubject reliability values range from 0.821 (time to return initial position (lumbar sensor)) to 0.883 (lumbosacral maximum angular displacement). FRT's reliability was 0.987 (0.983–0.992) and 0.983 (0.979–0.989) intersubject and intrasubject, respectively. Conclusion . The main conclusion could be that the inertial sensors are a tool with excellent reliability and validity in the parameterization of the FRT in people who have had a stroke.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom