z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Controversies in the Anesthetic Management of Intraoperative Rupture of Intracranial Aneurysm
Author(s) -
Tumul Chowdhury,
Andrea Petropolis,
Marshall F. Wilkinson,
Bernhard Schaller,
Nora Sandu,
Ronald B. Cappellani
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
anesthesiology research and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.3
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1687-6970
pISSN - 1687-6962
DOI - 10.1155/2014/595837
Subject(s) - medicine , aneurysm , clipping (morphology) , subarachnoid hemorrhage , anesthetic , endovascular coiling , anesthesia , neuroprotection , hypothermia , intensive care medicine , surgery , endovascular treatment , linguistics , philosophy
Despite great advancements in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), outcomes following SAH rupture have remained relatively unchanged. In addition, little data exists to guide the anesthetic management of intraoperative aneurysm rupture (IAR), though intraoperative management may have a significant effect on overall neurological outcomes. This review highlights the various controversies related to different anesthetic management related to aneurysm rupture. The first controversy relates to management of preexisting factors that affect risk of IAR. The second controversy relates to diagnostic techniques, particularly neurophysiological monitoring. The third controversy pertains to hemodynamic goals. The neuroprotective effects of various factors, including hypothermia, various anesthetic/pharmacologic agents, and burst suppression, remain poorly understood and have yet to be further elucidated. Different management strategies for IAR during aneurysmal clipping versus coiling also need further attention.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom