Solubility of Two Resin Composites in Different Mouthrinses | Zendy

Sezin Özer | Zendy; Emine Şen Tunç | Zendy; Nuray Tüloğlu | Zendy; Şule Bayrak | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Solubility of Two Resin Composites in Different Mouthrinses

Author(s) -

Sezin Özer,

Emine Şen Tunç,

Nuray Tüloğlu,

Şule Bayrak

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

biomed research international

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772

H-Index - 126

eISSN - 2314-6141

pISSN - 2314-6133

DOI - 10.1155/2014/580675

Subject(s) - composite material , solubility , materials science , resin composite , composite number , chemistry , organic chemistry

Aim . This study aimed to compare the solubility of a universal restorative resin composite (Filtek Z250; FZ250) and a silorane-based resin composite (Filtek Silorane; FS) after immersion in alcohol-containing mouthrinse, alcohol-free mouthrinse, and artificial saliva. Methods . 30 discs (10 mm × 1 mm) were prepared from each material and desiccated until a constant mass was obtained. Specimens were immersed in the test solutions for two days and desiccated again. Solubility was calculated based on the change in weight of each specimen before and after immersion. Data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's Post Hoc test ( P < 0.05). Results . Solubility values for both resin composites were the highest in the alcohol-containing mouthrinse. FZ250 showed greater solubility than FS; the difference was only significant in artificial saliva. Conclusion . Both resin-composite materials tested exhibited some degree of solubility in each of the test solutions. The use of an alcohol-free mouthrinse may be preferable for patients with extensive composite restorations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research