The Cubit: A History and Measurement Commentary
Author(s) -
Mark H. Stone
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
advances in library and information science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2090-4088
pISSN - 2090-4096
DOI - 10.1155/2014/489757
Subject(s) - galton's problem , dimension (graph theory) , documentation , anthropometry , forearm , history , genealogy , geography , archaeology , statistics , mathematics , medicine , computer science , pathology , pure mathematics , programming language
Historical dimensions for the cubit are provided by scripture and pyramid documentation. Additional dimensions from the Middle East are found in other early documents. Two major dimensions emerge from a history of the cubit. The first is the anthropological or short cubit, and the second is the architectual or long cubit. The wide geographical area and long chronological period suggest that cubit dimensions varied over time and geographic area. Greek and Roman conquests led to standardization. More recent dimensions are provided from a study by Francis Galton based upon his investigations into anthropometry. The subjects for Galton’s study and those of several other investigators lacked adequate sample descriptions for producing a satisfactory cubit/forearm dimension. This finding is not surprising given the demise of the cubit in today’s world. Contemporary dimensions from military and civilian anthropometry for the forearm and hand allow comparison to the ancient unit. Although there appears no pressing need for a forearm-hand/cubit dimension, the half-yard or half-meter unit seems a useful one that could see more application
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom