A Single Surgeon’s Experience with Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
Author(s) -
Zachary Klaassen,
Robert M. Kohut,
Dhruti Patel,
Martha K. Terris,
Rabii Madi
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international scholarly research notices
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2356-7872
DOI - 10.1155/2014/430914
Subject(s) - nephrectomy , medicine , general surgery , open surgery , computer science , surgery , kidney
Objective . To report the perioperative outcomes of patients treated with partial nephrectomy by a single surgeon using three surgical modalities—open, laparoscopic, and robotic. Methods . Between August 2006 and February 2012, 106 consecutive patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) ( n = 23), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) ( n = 48), and robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) ( n = 35) by a single surgeon. Clinical variables, operative parameters, and renal functional outcomes were analyzed. Results . Preoperative patient characteristics were similar except for baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which was highest in the RPN group ( P = 0.004). Surgery time was longest in the RPN group (244 minutes) and shortest in the OPN group (163 minutes, P < 0.0001). Patients who had OPN had the highest incidence of 30-day complications (30%), while the RPN approach had the lowest (14%, P = 0.008). Conclusions . When performed by a single surgeon, robotic partial nephrectomy appears to be associated with fewer complications than both open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Kidney function was not affected by surgical approach.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom