Variability in the Management of Superficial Venous Thrombophlebitis across Practitioners Based in North America and the Global Community
Author(s) -
Anahita Dua,
Jennifer A. Heller,
Bhavin Patel,
Sapan S. Desai
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
thrombosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.494
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 2090-1496
pISSN - 2090-1488
DOI - 10.1155/2014/306018
Subject(s) - algorithm , medicine , artificial intelligence , computer science , machine learning
. This study aimed to compare management patterns of patients with SVT among healthcare practitioners based in North America versus those in the global community. Methods . A 17-question, multiple choice survey with questions regarding SVT diagnosis and management strategies was provided to practitioners who attended the American Venous Forum (AVF) meeting in 2011. Results . There were 487 practitioners surveyed with 365 classified as North American (US or Canada) and 122 (56 Europe, 25 Asia, 11 South America, and 7 Africa) representing the global community. The key difference seen between the groups was in the initial imaging study used in patients presenting with SVT ( P = 0.046) and physicians in the US ordered fewer bilateral duplex ultrasounds and more unilateral duplex ultrasounds (49.6% versus 58.2%, 39.7% versus 34.4%). In the US cohort, phlebologists and vascular surgeons constituted 82% ( n = 300) of the specialties surveyed. In the global community, SVT was managed by phlebologists or vascular surgeons 44% ( n = 54) of the time. Surgical management was highly variable between groups. Conclusion . There is currently no consensus between or among practitioners in North America or globally as to the surgical management of SVT, duration of follow-up, and anticoagulation parameters.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom