z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Randomized Clinical Trial: The Clinical Effects of Herb-Partitioned Moxibustion in Patients with Diarrhoea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Author(s) -
Yuxia Ma,
Xiao Liu,
CunZhi Liu,
Linpeng Wang,
Gang Guo,
Dongqing Du,
Zhilei Wang,
Hong Ma,
Ping Qi,
Zhaofeng Li,
Yanping Guo,
Hua-Qiang Yi,
Gao Shu-zhong
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.552
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1741-4288
pISSN - 1741-427X
DOI - 10.1155/2013/605460
Subject(s) - abdominal distension , medicine , irritable bowel syndrome , gastroenterology , moxibustion , abdominal pain , randomized controlled trial , therapeutic effect , herb , defecation , adverse effect , acupuncture , traditional medicine , medicinal herbs , alternative medicine , pathology
Objective . To explore the efficacy of Herb-partitioned moxibustion in treating IBS-D patients. Method . 210 IBS-D patients were randomly assigned on a 3 : 3 : 2 basis to group HM, group FM, or group PB for 4-week treatment. The change of GSRS total score at weeks 4 and 8, the changes of GSRS specific scores, and adverse events were evaluated. Results . Patients in group HM and group FM had lower GSRS total score at week 4 (1.98 ± 0.303, 2.93 ± 0.302 versus 3.73 ± 0.449) and at week 8 (2.75 ± 0.306, 3.56 ± 0.329 versus 4.39 ± 2.48) as compared with patients' score in group PB. However, there was no significant difference of GSRS total score between group HM and group FM. The effect of HM was significantly greater than that of orally taking PB in ameliorating the symptoms of rugitus (0.38 versus 0.59, P < 0.05), abdominal pain (0.28 versus 0.57, P < 0.01), abdominal distension (0.4 versus 0.7, P < 0.01), and increased passage of stools (0.06 versus 0.25, P < 0.01) at the end of treatment period. In the follow-up period, patients' therapeutic effect in group HM remained greater than that in group FM (in abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and increased passage of stools) and that in group PB (in loose stools). Conclusions . HM appears to be a promising, efficacious, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with IBS-D.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom