Serosorting and HIV/STI Infection among HIV-Negative MSM and Transgender People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform WHO Guidelines
Author(s) -
Caitlin E. Kennedy,
Laura Bernard,
Kathryn E. Muessig,
Kelika A. Konda,
Elie A. Akl,
Ying-Ru Lo,
Antonio Gerbase,
Kevin O’Reilly
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of sexually transmitted diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2090-7893
pISSN - 2090-7958
DOI - 10.1155/2013/583627
Subject(s) - medicine , men who have sex with men , condom , confidence interval , transgender women , meta analysis , odds ratio , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , pre exposure prophylaxis , demography , family medicine , syphilis , sociology
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between serosorting and HIV infection, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and quality of life among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and abstracted data. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models. Of 310 citations reviewed, 4 observational studies, all with MSM, met inclusion criteria. Compared to consistent condom use, serosorting was associated with increased risk of HIV (3 studies, odds ratio (OR): 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.21–2.70) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.44–1.83). Compared to no condom use, serosorting was associated with reduced risk of HIV (3 studies, OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25–0.83) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73–0.91). Among HIV-negative MSM, condom use appears to be more protective against HIV and STIs than serosorting and should be encouraged. However, serosorting may be better than no condom use as a harm reduction strategy.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom