English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives . The objective of this study was to compare the damage to the rotator cuff tendons caused by four different anchor systems.  Methods . 20 cadaveric human shoulder joints were used for transtendon insertion of four anchor systems. The Healix Peek, Fastin RC, Bio-Corkscrew Suture, and Healix Transtend anchors were inserted through the tendons using standard transtendon procedures. The areas of tendon damage were measured.  Results . The areas of tendon damage (mean ± standard deviation,  n  = 7) were 29.1 ± 4.3 mm 2  for the Healix Peek anchor, 20.4 ± 2.3 mm 2  for the Fastin RC anchor, 23.4 ± 1.2 mm 2  for the Bio-Corkscrew Suture anchor, 13.7 ± 3.2 mm 2  for the Healix Transtend anchor inserted directly, and 9.1 ± 2.1 mm 2  for the Healix Transtend anchor inserted through the Percannula system ( P  < 0.001 or  P  < 0.001, compared to other anchors).  Conclusions . In a cadaver transtendon rotator cuff repair model, smaller anchors caused less damage to the tendon tissues. The Healix Transtend implant system caused the least damage to the tendon tissues. Our findings suggest that smaller anchors should be considered when performing transtendon procedures to repair partial rotator cuff tears.

Comparison of the Tendon Damage Caused by Four Different Anchor Systems Used in Transtendon Rotator Cuff Repair