z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge
Author(s) -
Derek Duggan,
Sheng Zhong,
Eric M. Rivera,
Roland R. Arnold,
E. Jeanne Simmons
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
international journal of dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.61
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1687-8736
pISSN - 1687-8728
DOI - 10.1155/2012/365231
Subject(s) - leakage (economics) , significant difference , statistical analysis , penetration (warfare) , dentistry , streptococcus mutans , chemistry , biology , medicine , mathematics , bacteria , statistics , genetics , operations research , economics , macroeconomics
Objective . This study compared the leakage resistance of a New Sealer Prototype (NSP) with a traditional sealer (AH 26) in Resilon-filled roots subjected to a bacterial challenge. Study Design . 41 roots were instrumented to ISO size 50 apically. Group 1 ( n = 20) contained Resilon and AH 26 sealer and roots in group 2 ( n = 21) contained Resilon and NSP. Roots were embedded in a dual-chamber model with the upper chamber containing Streptococcus mutans inoculum. Evidence of bacterial penetration was observed for 1 month. Fisher's Test was used to analyze the data. Results . 8 of 20 roots (40%) in the AH 26 group demonstrated leakage whereas 3 of 21 roots (14%) in the NSP group leaked. The difference in leakage rates was not statistically significant ( P = 0.053). Conclusion . The traditional sealer (AH 26) demonstrated increased leakage rates compared to the New Sealer Prototype (NSP), but the difference did not reach statistical significance in this study.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom