z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
DSD and Professionalism from a Multilateral View: Supplementing the Consensus Statement on the Basis of a Qualitative Survey
Author(s) -
Jürg C. Streuli,
Birgit Köhler,
Knut Werner-Rosen,
Christine Mitchell
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
advances in urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.18
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1687-6377
pISSN - 1687-6369
DOI - 10.1155/2012/185787
Subject(s) - statement (logic) , medicine , consensus conference , political science , law
Treatment and support of a child with DSD calls for experience and expertise in diagnosis, surgical techniques, understanding of psychosocial issues, and recognizing and accepting the significance of individual values of children, families, and support groups. The range of what is considered “appropriate” care and treatment is still very broad and critics point at major gaps between ethical guidelines and current clinical practice. Based on a qualitative study with 27 members of multidisciplinary teams and support groups, we supplement the professional consensus statements and current ethical guidelines with 14 requirements from four different perspectives, to characterize more fully the responsible treatment and support of children and families affected by DSD. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of close collaborations between different experts and a shift from the often simplified dispute about genital surgeries to a more holistic perspective with a long-term management strategy, which should serve as a cornerstone not only for clinical practice but also for future research and evaluation studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom