z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mentorship Programs for Faculty Development in Academic General Pediatric Divisions
Author(s) -
Jennifer Takagishi,
Sharon Dabrow
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international journal of pediatrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1687-9759
pISSN - 1687-9740
DOI - 10.1155/2011/538616
Subject(s) - mentorship , medicine , promotion (chess) , medical education , political science , politics , law
. Mentoring relationships have been shown to support academicians in areas of research, work/life balance, and promotion. Methods . General pediatric division chiefs accessed an electronic survey asking about mentorship relationships, their ability to create a mentorship program, and resources needed. Results . Dyadic mentorship programs were available at 53% of divisions. Peer mentorship programs were available at 27% of divisions. Overall, 84% of chiefs believed that dyadic mentorship would benefit their faculty. 91% of chiefs believed that peer mentorship would benefit their faculty. Chiefs were interested in starting peer (57%) or dyadic (55%) mentorship programs. Few divisions had a peer mentorship program available, whereas 24% already had a dyadic program. 43% of chiefs felt that they had the tools to start a program. Many tools are needed to create a program. Discussion . General pediatric division chiefs acknowledge the benefits of mentoring relationships, and some have programs in place. Many need tools to create them. Pediatric societies could facilitate this critical area of professional development.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom