Place Cells, Grid Cells, Attractors, and Remapping
Author(s) -
Kathryn J. Jeffery
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
neural plasticity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.288
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 2090-5904
pISSN - 1687-5443
DOI - 10.1155/2011/182602
Subject(s) - attractor , grid cell , representation (politics) , computer science , matrix (chemical analysis) , place cell , modulation (music) , dynamics (music) , grid , space (punctuation) , neuroscience , biological system , physics , mathematics , biology , chemistry , mathematical analysis , geometry , chromatography , politics , political science , hippocampus , acoustics , law , operating system
Place and grid cells are thought to use a mixture of external sensory information and internal attractor dynamics to organize their activity. Attractor dynamics may explain both why neurons react coherently following sufficiently large changes to the environment (discrete attractors) and how firing patterns move smoothly from one representation to the next as an animal moves through space (continuous attractors). However, some features of place cell behavior, such as the sometimes independent responsiveness of place cells to environmental change (called “remapping”), seem hard to reconcile with attractor dynamics. This paper suggests that the explanation may be found in an anatomical separation of the two attractor systems coupled with a dynamic contextual modulation of the connection matrix between the two systems, with new learning being back-propagated into the matrix. Such a scheme could explain how place cells sometimes behave coherently and sometimes independently.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom