z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Optimizing Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease – Practical Issues: A Canadian Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Author(s) -
Darcy Marciniuk,
Dina Brooks,
Scotty Butcher,
Richard Debigaré,
Gail Dechman,
Gordon Ford,
Véronique Pépin,
Darlene Reid,
A. William Sheel,
Michael K. Stickland,
D. Todd,
Shan Walker,
Shawn D. Aaron,
Meyer Balter,
Jean Bourbeau,
Paul Hernandez,
François Maltais,
Denis E. O’Donnell,
Donna Bleakney,
Brian Carlin,
Roger Goldstein,
Stella K Muthuri
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
canadian respiratory journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.675
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1916-7245
pISSN - 1198-2241
DOI - 10.1155/2010/425975
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonary rehabilitation , copd , guideline , exacerbation , rehabilitation , physical therapy , pulmonary disease , bronchodilator , quality of life (healthcare) , acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , intensive care medicine , asthma , nursing , pathology
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) participation is the standard of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who remain symptomatic despite bronchodilator therapies. However, there are questions about specific aspects of PR programming including optimal site of rehabilitation delivery, components of rehabilitation programming, duration of rehabilitation, target populations and timing of rehabilitation. The present document was compiled to specifically address these important clinical issues, using an evidence-based, systematic review process led by a representative interprofessional panel of experts. The evidence reveals there are no differences in major patient-related outcomes of PR between nonhospital- (community or home sites) or hospital-based sites. There is strong support to recommend that COPD patients initiate PR within one month following an acute exacerbation due to benefits of improved dyspnea, exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life relative to usual care. Moreover, the benefits of PR are evident in both men and women, and in patients with moderate, severe and very severe COPD. The current review also suggests that longer PR programs, beyond six to eight weeks duration, be provided for COPD patients, and that while aerobic training is the foundation of PR, endurance and functional ability may be further improved with both aerobic and resistance training.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom