Characterization ofPseudomonas aeruginosaIsolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals: Results of the CANWARD 2007 Study
Author(s) -
Andrew Walkty,
Melanie DeCorby,
Kim Nichol,
Melissa McCracken,
Michael R. Mulvey,
James A. Karlowsky,
Daryl J. Hoban,
George G. Zhanel
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
canadian journal of infectious diseases and medical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.634
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1918-1493
pISSN - 1712-9532
DOI - 10.1155/2009/431529
Subject(s) - cefepime , meropenem , amikacin , medicine , piperacillin , colistin , tazobactam , levofloxacin , broth microdilution , ciprofloxacin , microbiology and biotechnology , piperacillin/tazobactam , antimicrobial , pseudomonas aeruginosa , antibiotics , minimum inhibitory concentration , antibiotic resistance , biology , imipenem , bacteria , genetics
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important nosocomialpathogen. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate theantimicrobial susceptibility profile of P aeruginosa isolates obtainedfrom patients in different areas of Canadian hospitals.METHODS: From January to December 2007 inclusive, 12 sentinelhospitals across Canada submitted clinical isolates from patientsattending emergency rooms, medical wards, surgical wards and intensivecare units (ICUs) (the Canadian Ward Surveillance Study[CANWARD 2007]). Each centre was asked to submit clinical isolates(consecutive, one per patient per infection site) from blood (n=360),respiratory (n=200), urine (n=100) and wound/intravenous (n=50)infections. Susceptibility testing was performed using Clinical andLaboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods.Multidrug-resistant (MDR; resistant to at least three different antimicrobialclasses) isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.RESULTS: In total, 451 P aeruginosa isolates were collected (representing7% of all CANWARD 2007 isolates). The rank order of antimicrobialsusceptibility was as follows (percent susceptible): amikacin(93.1%) = piperacillin/tazobactam (93.1%) > meropenem (87.4%) >cefepime (69.4%) > ciprofloxacin (67.2%) > gentamicin (66.1%) >levofloxacin (60.5%). Reduced susceptibility to cefepime, meropenemand levofloxacin was observed more frequently among ICU isolates(P<0.05). Thirty-four isolates (7.5%) were MDR. MDR isolates weremore likely to be obtained from patients in an ICU (P=0.003) and lesslikely to come from a bloodstream source (P=0.008). Excluding colistin(polymyxin E), amikacin and piperacillin/tazobactam, followed bymeropenem, were the most active antimicrobials evaluated versus theMDR isolates. All of the MDR isolates were susceptible to colistin.The majority of MDR isolates were genetically unrelated.CONCLUSIONS: P aeruginosa is common among clinical specimensfrom patients in Canadian hospitals. Of the antipseudomonal antimicrobialsevaluated, amikacin, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactamdemonstrated the greatest in vitro activity. Isolates with reduced antimicrobialsusceptibility and MDR isolates were more often obtainedfrom ICU patients. All of the MDR isolates remained susceptible tocolistin
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom