Blurring Borders: Innate Immunity with Adaptive Features
Author(s) -
Krisztián Kvell,
Cooper El,
Péter Engelmann,
Judit Bovári,
Pèter Németh
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
clinical and developmental immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1740-2530
pISSN - 1740-2522
DOI - 10.1155/2007/83671
Subject(s) - innate immune system , biology , acquired immune system , immunity , cognitive science , communication , evolutionary biology , immunology , immune system , sociology , psychology
Adaptive immunity has often been considered the penultimate of immune capacities. That system is now being deconstructed to encompass less stringent rules that govern its initiation, actual effector activity, and ambivalent results. Expanding the repertoire of innate immunity found in all invertebrates has greatly facilitated the relaxation of convictions concerning what actually constitutes innate and adaptive immunity. Two animal models, incidentally not on the line of chordate evolution ( C. elegans and Drosophila ), have contributed enormously to defining homology. The characteristics of specificity and memory and whether the antigen is pathogenic or nonpathogenic reveal considerable information on homology, thus deconstructing the more fundamentalist view. Senescence, cancer, and immunosuppression often associated with mammals that possess both innate and adaptive immunity also exist in invertebrates that only possess innate immunity. Strict definitions become blurred casting skepticism on the utility of creating rigid definitions of what innate and adaptive immunity are without considering overlaps.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom