Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom
Author(s) -
Craig Gerrand,
Lucinda Billingham,
Penella J. Woll,
R. J. Grimer
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
sarcoma
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.781
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1369-1643
pISSN - 1357-714X
DOI - 10.1155/2007/34128
Subject(s) - medicine , soft tissue sarcoma , trunk , sarcoma , soft tissue , clinical practice , surgery , physical therapy , pathology , ecology , biology
Despite the clinical and financial implications, there is little evidence about how patients who have been treated for soft tissue sarcoma should be followed up. The purpose of this study was to determine current practice in the United Kingdom. 192 clinicians treating patients with soft tissue sarcoma were surveyed with a postal questionnaire enquiring about frequency and method of follow up and how patients would be followed up in each of 3 clinical scenarios: a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at low risk of relapse; a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at high risk of relapse; and a patient with a retroperitoneal or abdominal tumour. 155 (81%) clinicians responded. Clinic visits and X-rays were the most frequently used methods of follow up. Chest CT scans, local site imaging, and blood tests were used infrequently. The intensity and methods of follow up varied with each of the clinical scenarios. There was a seven-to-twenty fold variation in cost between the least and the most expensive regimes. Respondents were generally supportive of the development of the clinical trial in this area.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom