Distinction between Pore Assembly by Staphylococcalα -Toxin versus Leukotoxins
Author(s) -
Olivier Joubert,
Joëlle Voegelin,
Valérie Guillet,
S. Tranier,
Sandra Werner,
Didier Colin,
Mauro Dalla Serra,
Daniel Keller,
H. Monteil,
Lionel Mourey,
Gilles Prévost
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of biomedicine and biotechnology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1110-7251
pISSN - 1110-7243
DOI - 10.1155/2007/25935
Subject(s) - bipartite graph , combinatorics , monomer , toxin , crystallography , biology , stereochemistry , chemistry , physics , mathematics , biochemistry , polymer , nuclear magnetic resonance , graph
The staphylococcal bipartite leukotoxins and the homoheptameric α-toxin belong to the same family of β-barrel pore-forming toxins despite slight differences. In the α-toxin pore, the N-terminal extremity of each protomer interacts as a deployed latch with two consecutive protomers in the vicinity of the pore lumen. N-terminal extremities of leukotoxins as seen in their three-dimensional structures are heterogeneous in length and take part in the β-sandwich core of soluble monomers. Hence, the interaction of these N-terminal extremities within structures of adjacent monomers is questionable. We show here that modifications of their N-termini by two different processes, using fusion with glutathione S-transferase (GST) and bridging of the N-terminal extremity to the adjacent β-sheet via disulphide bridges, are not deleterious for biological activity. Therefore, bipartite leukotoxins do not need a large extension of their N-terminal extremities to form functional pores, thus illustrating a microheterogeneity of the structural organizations between bipartite leukotoxins and α-toxin
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom