English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Sir—We read with great interest the article by Ramsey and colleagues [1]. In their study, they concluded that imiquimod had no efficacy in controlling Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn (mouse pneumonitis agent) infection in a murine model of female genital tract infection. Imiquimod is an immune response modifier that induces the production of an array of essentially Th1 response promoting cytokines, most notably tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma, the pluripotent cytokine that is considered essential in both the innate and the acquired immune response to C. trachomatis genital tract infection. We, as well as others, have shown that the course of female genital tract infection with MoPn in IFNgamma knockout mice is only minimally different when compared with genetically intact mice, whereas infection with a human isolate of C. trachomatis serovar D is uncontrolled during the acute phase and of significantly longer duration in interferon-gamma deficient mice [2, 3]. Therefore, we investigated the effect of various regimens of vaginally applied imiquimod on the course of infection in essentially the same murine model of C. trachomatis female genital tract infection as used by Ramsey and colleagues, but employing a strain belonging to the human oculogenital biovar of C. trachomatis. In brief, CF-1 mice treated with progesterone were inoculated intravaginally by direct instillation of 10 ml of bacterial suspension containing 1 X 10 inclusion-forming units (ifu) of C. trachomatis serovar D [4]. On the days before (7) and after ( + ) infection as indicated in the results table, 10 ml of imiquimod (Aldara), diluted 1:4 in saline or a placebo similar in composition to the inactive base used in the imiquimod preparation, was administered intravaginally [5]. The presence of Chlamydia in the lower genital tract was determined by culturing the vaginal contents as previously described, and the duration of infection between groups was analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test [2, 4, 5]. As displayed below, we observed a statistically significant reduction in the median duration of infection in mice treated prophylactically with imiquimod several times before and during the acute phase of C. trachomatis infection, i.e. 4 days for treated animals compared with 19 days for the group receiving placebo. No effect on the course of infection was seen with other regimens, a single application 2 h before or multiple applications every other day beginning 4 days after chlamydial inoculation and ending on day 14 (data not shown). Remarkably, in the prophylactically treated group on day 2, no effect was observed on the incidence of infection when compared with the placebo group. However, by day 4 differences between the groups were apparent, implying that treated mice were primed to respond more rapidly to infection, while apparently unaltered in their susceptibility to initial infection. In mice, imiquimod is reported to act through the Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) MyD88dependent signalling pathway This suggests that, in contrast to the speculation of Ramsey and colleagues, sufficient quantities of the TLR7 are expressed in the mouse genital epithelium or in tissues adjacent to the genital epithelium to allow a response to imiquimod.

The Influence of Vaginally Applied Imiquimod on the Course ofChlamydia trachomatisSerovar D Infection in a Murine Model