English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Hilsden et al conducted a postal survey of members of the  Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of Canada (CCFC), gathering  data on the use of both conventional therapy and complementary  and alternative medicine (CAM). The response rate was 76%  (quite good for a mailed survey), although 9% of respondents  stated that they did not actually have inflammatory bowel disease  (IBD) (their data were excluded from the analysis). The  data regarding CAM use were difficult to follow, as there was a  blending of past and current reported use of CAM, as well as of  CAM use specifically for IBD as opposed to for non-IBD reasons.  Current or past use of CAM for IBD was reported by 47% of  respondents, and ongoing use for IBD specifically was reported  by 24%. It appears that most of the CAM used by IBD patients  was not for their IBD. An important finding was that approximately  half of IBD patients use CAM either for their IBD or for  other reasons. The main CAM used was acidophilus (19%), followed  by massage (18%) and flax seed (13%)

canadian journal of gastroenterology

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use by Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Are Canadian Physicians Failing with Conventional Therapy, or Not?