A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review | Zendy

John WD McDonald | Zendy; Jeffrey L. Mahon | Zendy; Kelly B. Zarnke | Zendy; Brian G. Feagan | Zendy; Lorinda Simms | Zendy; Wayne C. Tucker | Zendy

Open Access

A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review

Author(s) -

John WD McDonald,

Jeffrey L. Mahon,

Kelly B. Zarnke,

Brian G. Feagan,

Lorinda Simms,

Wayne C. Tucker

Publication year - 2002

Publication title -

canadian journal of gastroenterology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 1916-7237

pISSN - 0835-7900

DOI - 10.1155/2002/513758

Subject(s) - systematic review , narrative , medicine , narrative review , medline , alternative medicine , cochrane collaboration , randomized controlled trial , crohn's disease , disease , family medicine , cochrane library , psychology , intensive care medicine , surgery , pathology , literature , art , political science , law

Clinicians often rely on review material rather than analysis of primary research to guide therapy. Systematic reviews use methods to insure thoroughness and to minimize bias, but many clinicians are not familiar with systematic reviews and continue to rely on narrative reviews.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research