Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Topical Mupirocin and Placebo for the Prevention of Infection Associated with Central Venous Catheters | Zendy

John Conly | Zendy; Robert Rennie | Zendy; Leonard Tan | Zendy; Colin Bagg | Zendy; Karen Stein | Zendy; B. Peters | Zendy

Open Access

Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Topical Mupirocin and Placebo for the Prevention of Infection Associated with Central Venous Catheters

Author(s) -

John Conly,

Robert Rennie,

Leonard Tan,

Colin Bagg,

Karen Stein,

B. Peters

Publication year - 1996

Publication title -

canadian journal of infectious diseases and medical microbiology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 1918-1493

pISSN - 1712-9532

DOI - 10.1155/1997/205938

Subject(s) - mupirocin , medicine , placebo , randomized controlled trial , double blind , prospective cohort study , surgery , bloodstream infection , anesthesia , intensive care medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus , biology , bacteria , genetics , staphylococcus aureus

To compare the incidence of exit site colonization, local catheter-related infection and catheter-related bacteremia in patients randomized to receive either topical 2% mupirocin or placebo at the catheter exit site.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research