A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Prenatal Screening for Toxoplasmosis
Author(s) -
Vic S. Sahai,
Heather Onyett
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
canadian journal of infectious diseases and medical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1918-1493
pISSN - 1712-9532
DOI - 10.1155/1996/678145
Subject(s) - toxoplasmosis , sulfadiazine , pyrimethamine , medicine , context (archaeology) , congenital toxoplasmosis , pediatrics , incidence (geometry) , cost analysis , pregnancy , toxoplasma gondii , prenatal screening , prenatal diagnosis , immunology , fetus , antibiotics , biology , malaria , paleontology , plasmodium falciparum , physics , genetics , optics , reliability engineering , antibody , microbiology and biotechnology , engineering
The objective of this study was to examine critically the validity of a toxoplasma prenatal screening program, in the context of a cost-benefit analysis, as it relates to the Canadian experience. Recently, studies have suggested that early treatment of infected infants with a combination of pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine is effective in reducing the sequelae of toxoplasmosis. It was concluded that a carefully planned screening program for detecting and treating infants infected with Toxoplasma gondii during pregnancy is cost beneficial. The cost of delivering a screening and treatment program is less than half of what it would cost to provide comprehensive long term medical, educational and other social services for the estimated 1000 children born each year with congenital toxoplasmosis. Even if an incidence as low as two infected infants per 1000 pregnancies is assumed and only 400 children were affected, the screening and preventive therapy program would be justified.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom