Need for Treatment of Gonorrhea to be Effective againstChlamydia trachomatis
Author(s) -
William Bowie,
Joanne Ast,
Linda Sibau,
Carol E. Shaw,
HUGH D. JONES,
W. A. P. Black
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
canadian journal of infectious diseases and medical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1918-1493
pISSN - 1712-9532
DOI - 10.1155/1993/613963
Subject(s) - gonorrhea , neisseria gonorrhoeae , chlamydia trachomatis , ceftriaxone , tetracycline , medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , antibiotics , gastroenterology , gynecology , biology , immunology , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv)
Men and women with gonorrhea or contact to gonorrhea are frequently co-infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. To assess the importance of using treatment regimens active against both Neisseria gonorrhoeae and C trachomatis, tetracycline 500 mg orally four times daily for five days, with activity against both organisms, was compared with ceftriaxone, 250 mg once intramuscularly, with activity against only N gonorrhoeae. N gonorrhoeae microbiological failure occurred in six of 148 patients (4%) on tetracycline and zero of 85 on ceftriaxone. Microbiological failure for C trachomatis occurred in zero of 27 on tetracycline and 10 of 12 (83%) on ceftriaxone (P<0.001). In addition, 14 others on ceftriaxone had C trachomatis first isolated after treatment. When all types of microbiologialc and clinical failures are included, outcome was significantly better on tetracycline (P<0.001). Optimal treatment of patients with gonorrhea must include regimens with activity against both C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom