z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Common Bile Duct Stones ERCP or Surgery?
Author(s) -
P C Bornman
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
hpb surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.561
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1607-8462
pISSN - 0894-8569
DOI - 10.1155/1992/14576
Subject(s) - medicine , general surgery , common bile duct stone , common bile duct , bile duct , surgery
Stain, S. C., Cohen, H., Tsuishoysha, M., Donovan, A.J. (1991) Choledocholithiasis Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration. Annals of Surgery; 213:627-634 A prospective randomized trial was conducted of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgery (ES&S) or surgery alone (SA) in 52 patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis that were candidates for elective surgery. After ES&S 278 HPB INTERNATIONAL 65% of patients were stone free. Eighty-eight per cent of patients with SA were stone free after surgery (p < 0.05). Three patients in each group had residual stones at the completion of the operation. Five of these six had more than 20 common bile duct (CBD) stones. There was one episode of major hemorrhage in a patient in each group and no deaths. Costs were essentially equal for the individual patient with a successful ES as compared to SA. Societal costs of a program of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and ES would be higher because of the cost of screening for patients with CBD stones. These results do not support preoperative ES as a technique for clearance of the CBD of stones on the basis of efficacy, morbidity rate, or cost.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom