Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture
Author(s) -
Kayla Duval,
Hannah Grover,
LiHsin Han,
Yongchao Mou,
Adrian F. Pegoraro,
Jeffery Fredberg,
Zi Chen
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.14
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1548-9213
pISSN - 1548-9221
DOI - 10.1152/physiol.00036.2016
Subject(s) - 3d cell culture , function (biology) , regenerative medicine , cell culture , microbiology and biotechnology , tissue engineering , cell function , cell , biology , tissue culture , neuroscience , biochemical engineering , computational biology , stem cell , in vitro , biochemistry , engineering , genetics
Cell culture has become an indispensable tool to help uncover fundamental biophysical and biomolecular mechanisms by which cells assemble into tissues and organs, how these tissues function, and how that function becomes disrupted in disease. Cell culture is now widely used in biomedical research, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and industrial practices. Although flat, two-dimensional (2D) cell culture has predominated, recent research has shifted toward culture using three-dimensional (3D) structures, and more realistic biochemical and biomechanical microenvironments. Nevertheless, in 3D cell culture, many challenges remain, including the tissue-tissue interface, the mechanical microenvironment, and the spatiotemporal distributions of oxygen, nutrients, and metabolic wastes. Here, we review 2D and 3D cell culture methods, discuss advantages and limitations of these techniques in modeling physiologically and pathologically relevant processes, and suggest directions for future research.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom