English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Orthostatic stress such as head-up tilt (HUT) elicits a wide range of heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure (AP) responses among healthy individuals. In this study, we evaluated cardiovascular dynamics in healthy subjects with different HR responses to HUT, but without autonomic dysfunction. We measured AP (brachial artery) and HR (ECG) during 5 min of 60 degrees HUT in 76 healthy normotensive individuals. We then chose individuals on the basis of the extremes of HR responses to HUT (high = DeltaHR &gt; or = 20 beats/min, and low = DeltaHR &lt; or = 10 beats/min; n = 15 per group). Peak HR during HUT was 87 +/- 10 beats/min in the high and 69 +/- 14 beats/min in the low group (P &lt; 0.05). High HR responders had lower systolic pressure at baseline (121 +/- 9 vs. 129 +/- 11 mmHg, P &lt; 0.05) and during HUT (120 +/- 10 vs. 131 +/- 13 mmHg, P &lt; 0.05), and higher plasma norepinephrine (NE) response to HUT (DeltaNE: 156.9 +/- 17.8 vs. 89.0 +/- 17.2 pg/ml; P &lt; 0.05). DeltaNE during HUT was also significantly correlated with DeltaHR when all 76 subjects were included in a regression analysis (r = 0.39; P &lt; 0.001). Pulse pressure was lower during HUT in high HR responders compared with low HR responders (45 +/- 1 vs. 55 +/- 2 mmHg, P &lt; 0.05). High HR responders also had larger fluctuations in systolic and pulse pressure during HUT (coefficient of variation = 10.7 +/- 0.7 vs. 5.7 +/- 0.3%; 7.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.1 +/- 0.4%, respectively, P &lt; 0.05). Sex distribution was different between groups (high: 5 women, 10 men; low: 10 women, 5 men). Higher HR with lower AP during HUT is consistent with normal baroreflex mechanisms of integration. Although interindividual variability appears to be a fundamental part of cardiovascular regulation, the mechanisms of these differences and the sex discrepancy requires further investigation.

Cardiovascular dynamics in healthy subjects with differing heart rate responses to tilt