z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Regional airflow obstruction after bronchoconstriction and subsequent bronchodilation in subjects without pulmonary disease
Author(s) -
Eric T. Geier,
Rebecca J. Theilmann,
G. Kim Prisk,
Rui Carlos Sá
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of applied physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.253
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 8750-7587
pISSN - 1522-1601
DOI - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00912.2018
Subject(s) - bronchodilation , bronchoconstriction , medicine , cardiology , bronchodilator agents , pulmonary disease , anesthesia , nitrogen washout , respiratory disease , bronchodilator , asthma , lung volumes , lung , functional residual capacity
Some subjects with asthma have ventilation defects that are resistant to bronchodilator therapy, and it is thought that these resistant defects may be due to ongoing inflammation or chronic airway remodeling. However, it is unclear whether regional obstruction due to bronchospasm alone persists after bronchodilator therapy. To investigate this, six young, healthy subjects, in whom inflammation and remodeling were assumed to be absent, were bronchoconstricted with a PC 20 [the concentration of methacholine that elicits a 20% drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 )] dose of methacholine and subsequently bronchodilated with a standard dose of albuterol on three separate occasions. Specific ventilation imaging, a proton MRI technique, was used to spatially map specific ventilation across 80% of each subject’s right lung in each condition. The ratio between regional specific ventilation at baseline and after intervention was used to classify areas that had constricted. After albuterol rescue from methacholine bronchoconstriction, 12% (SD 9) of the lung was classified as constricted. Of the 12% of lung units that were classified as constricted after albuterol, approximately half [7% (SD 7)] had constricted after methacholine and failed to recover, whereas half [6% (SD 4)] had remained open after methacholine but became constricted after albuterol. The incomplete regional recovery was not reflected in the subjects’ FEV 1 measurements, which did not decrease from baseline ( P = 0.97), nor was it detectable as an increase in specific ventilation heterogeneity ( P = 0.78). NEW & NOTEWORTHY In normal subjects bronchoconstricted with methacholine and subsequently treated with albuterol, not all regions of the healthy lung returned to their prebronchoconstricted specific ventilation after albuterol, despite full recovery of integrative lung indexes (forced expiratory volume in 1 s and specific ventilation heterogeneity). The regions that remained bronchoconstricted following albuterol were those with the highest specific ventilation at baseline, which suggests that they may have received the highest methacholine dose.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom