Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
Author(s) -
Maarten H. G. Heusinkveld,
Tammo Delhaas,
Joost Lumens,
Wouter Huberts,
Bart Spronck,
Alun D. Hughes,
Koen D. Reesink
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of applied physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.253
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 8750-7587
pISSN - 1522-1601
DOI - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00769.2018
Subject(s) - arterial stiffness , pulse wave velocity , cardiology , medicine , amplitude , pulse wave analysis , blood pressure , pulse pressure , physics , optics
The augmentation index (AIx) is deemed to capture the deleterious effect on left ventricular (LV) work of increased wave reflection associated with stiffer arteries. However, its validity as a proxy for wave reflection magnitude has been questioned. We hypothesized that, in addition to increased wave reflection due to increased pulse wave velocity, LV myocardial shortening velocity influences AIx. Using a computational model of the circulation, we investigated the isolated and combined influences of myocardial shortening velocity v s,LV and arterial stiffness on AIx. Aortic blood pressure waveforms were characterized using AIx and the reflected wave pressure amplitude (p ̂ bw, obtained using wave separation analysis). Our reference simulation (normal v s,LV and arterial stiffness) was characterized by an AIx of 21%. A realistic reduction in v s,LV caused AIx to increase from 21 to 42%. An arterial stiffness increase, characterized by a relevant 1.0 m/s increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, caused AIx to increase from 21 to 41%. Combining the reduced v s,LV and increased arterial stiffness resulted in an AIx of 54%. In a multistep parametric analysis, both v s,LV and arterial stiffness were about equal determinants of AIx, whereasp ̂ bwwas only determined by arterial stiffness. Furthermore, the relation between increased AIx and LV stroke work was only ≈50% explained by an increase in arterial stiffness, the other factor being v s,LV . Thep ̂ bw, on the other hand, related less ambiguously to LV stroke work. We conclude that the AIx reflects both cardiac and vascular properties and should not be considered an exclusively vascular parameter. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used a state-of-the-art computational model to mechanistically investigate the validity of the augmentation index (AIx) as a proxy for (changes in) wave reflection. In contrary to current belief, we found that LV contraction velocity influences AIx as much as increased arterial stiffness, and increased AIx does not necessarily relate to an increase in LV stroke work. Wave reflection magnitude derived from considering pressure, as well as flow, does qualify as a determinant of LV stroke work.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom