z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Establishing the V̇o2 versus constant-work-rate relationship from ramp-incremental exercise: simple strategies for an unsolved problem
Author(s) -
Danilo Iannetta,
Rafael de Almeida Azevedo,
Daniel A. Keir,
Juan M. Murias
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of applied physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.253
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 8750-7587
pISSN - 1522-1601
DOI - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00508.2019
Subject(s) - work rate , respiratory compensation , work (physics) , constant (computer programming) , chemistry , reaction rate constant , zoology , mathematics , steady state (chemistry) , time constant , analytical chemistry (journal) , heart rate , anaerobic exercise , thermodynamics , physics , kinetics , medicine , biology , physical therapy , chromatography , computer science , programming language , engineering , quantum mechanics , blood pressure , electrical engineering
The dissociation between constant work rate of O 2 uptake (V̇o 2 ) and ramp V̇o 2 at a given work rate might be mitigated during slowly increasing ramp protocols. This study characterized the V̇o 2 dynamics in response to five different ramp protocols and constant-work-rate trials at the maximal metabolic steady state (MMSS) to characterize 1) the V̇o 2 gain (G) in the moderate, heavy, and severe domains, 2) the mean response time of V̇o 2 (MRT), and 3) the work rates at lactate threshold (LT) and respiratory compensation point (RCP). Eleven young individuals performed five ramp tests (5, 10, 15, 25, and 30 W/min), four to five time-to-exhaustions for critical power estimation, and two to three constant-work-rate trials for confirmation of the work rate at MMSS. G was greatest during the slowest ramp and progressively decreased with increasing ramp slopes (from ~12 to ~8 ml·min −1 ·W −1 , P 0.05). The work rate at MMSS was 215 ± 55 W and was similar and highly correlated with the work rate at RCP during the 5 W/min ramp ( P > 0.05, r = 0.99; Lin’s concordance coefficient = 0.99; bias = −3 W; root mean square error = 6 W). Findings showed that the dynamics of V̇o 2 (i.e., G) during ramp exercise explain the apparent dichotomy existing with constant-work-rate exercise. When these dynamics are appropriately “resolved”, LT is constant regardless of the ramp slope of choice, and RCP and MMSS display minimal variations between each other. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study demonstrates that the dynamics of V̇o 2 during ramp-incremental exercise are dependent on the characteristics of the increments in work rate, such that during slow-incrementing ramp protocols the magnitude of the dissociation between ramp V̇o 2 and constant V̇o 2 at a given work rate is reduced. Accurately accounting for these dynamics ensures correct characterizations of the V̇o 2 kinetics at ramp onset and allows appropriate comparisons between ramp and constant-work-rate exercise-derived indexes of exercise intensity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom