z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Discerning aortic waves during intra-aortic balloon pumping and their relation to benefits of counterpulsation in humans
Author(s) -
Christina Kolyva,
George M. Pantalos,
Guruprasad A. Giridharan,
John Pepper,
Ashraf W. Khir
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of applied physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.253
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 8750-7587
pISSN - 1522-1601
DOI - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00413.2009
Subject(s) - cardiology , hemodynamics , medicine , balloon , aortic pressure , intra aortic balloon pump , blood pressure , aorta , intensity (physics) , diastole , intra aortic balloon pumping , myocardial infarction , cardiogenic shock , physics , quantum mechanics
An explanation of the mechanisms leading to the beneficial hemodynamic effects of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is lacking. We hypothesized that inflation and deflation of the balloon would generate a compression (BCW) and an expansion (BEW) wave, respectively, which, when analyzed with wave intensity analysis, could be used to explain the hemodynamic benefits of IABP support. Simultaneous ascending aortic pressure (P(ao)) and flow rate (Q(ao)) were recorded in 25 patients during control conditions and with IABP support of 1:1 and 1:2. Diastolic aortic pressure augmentation (P(aug)) and end-diastolic aortic pressure (ED P(ao)) reduction were calculated from P(ao). Energies of the BCW and BEW were obtained by integrating the wave intensity contour over time. P(aug) was 19.1 mmHg (SD 13.6) during 1:2 support. During 1:1 support significantly higher P(aug) of 21.1 mmHg (SD 13.4) was achieved (P < 0.001). ED P(ao) decreased from 50.9 mmHg (SD 15.1) to 43.9 mmHg (SD 15.7) (P < 0.0001) during 1:1 assistance and the decrease was not statistically different with 1:2. During 1:1 support the energy of BCW was correlated positively to P(aug) (r = 0.83, P < 0.0001) and energy of the BEW correlated negatively to ED P(ao) (r = 0.78, P < 0.005); these relationships were not statistically different during 1:2. In conclusion, the energies of the BCW and BEW are directly related to P(aug) and ED P(ao), which are the conventional hemodynamic parameters indicating IABP benefits. These findings imply a cause and effect mechanism between the energies of BCW and BEW, and IABP hemodynamic effects.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom