Relationship between cerebral blood flow estimated by transcranial Doppler ultrasound and single-photon emission computed tomography in elderly people with dementia

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography is a noninvasive technique allowing continuous recording of cerebral blood flow (CBF) velocity. However, it is unclear whether the CBF estimated by TCD would be reliable for the comparison between individuals. The present study aimed to clarify the relationship between middle cerebral artery blood flow (MCA BF) measured by TCD and regional and total CBF measured by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CBF) with a quantification software program, a three-dimensional stereotaxic region of interest template. We recruited 91 elderly subjects with and without dementia. MCA blood flow velocity (MCA V) and middle cerebral artery cross-sectional area (A M ) were measured by TCD and magnetic resonance angiography, respectively. MCA BF was calculated by the product of MCA V and A M . Diastolic or mean MCA V and MCA BF were significantly correlated with SPECT-CBF in several segments. Interestingly, the correlation coefficient in the temporal segment of SPECT-CBF was higher than those of the other segments. Moreover, correlations between MCA BF and SPECT-CBF were stronger as compared with those between MCA V and SPECT-CBF. These findings suggest that both mean MCA V and MCA BF with TCD ultrasonography would be useful for CBF comparison between individuals especially in the temporal region, although estimated blood flow with arterial area seems to be better than using simple flow velocity. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Correlations between middle cerebral artery blood flow (MCA BF) calculated by the product of MCA blood flow velocity (MCA V) and middle cerebral artery cross-sectional area and regional and total cerebral blood flow (CBF) measured by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CBF) were stronger as compared with those between MCA V and SPECT-CBF. These findings suggest that both mean MCA V and MCA BF would be useful for CBF comparison between individuals although estimated blood flow with arterial area seems to be better than using simple flow velocity.