Maintaining the integrity of peer review | Zendy

Peter D. Wagner | Zendy; Jason H. T. Bates | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Maintaining the integrity of peer review

Author(s) -

Peter D. Wagner,

Jason H. T. Bates

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

journal of applied physiology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.253

H-Index - 229

eISSN - 8750-7587

pISSN - 1522-1601

DOI - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00067.2016

Subject(s) - scrutiny , transparency (behavior) , publication , peer review , cornerstone , public relations , scientific misconduct , political science , computer science , engineering ethics , internet privacy , business , medicine , law , alternative medicine , engineering , art , pathology , visual arts

for most journals, peer review remains the cornerstone of deciding which manuscripts to publish. At its best, peer review does much more than simply decide between accept and reject. Thoughtful, unbiased analyses by scientific peers often reveal issues not considered by the authors themselves,

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research