z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Assessment for learning: a needs analysis study using formative assessment to evaluate the need for curriculum reform in basic sciences
Author(s) -
Reem Rachel Abraham,
Faith Alele,
Ullas Kamath,
Annamma Kurien,
S. Kiranmai,
Indira Bairy,
Mohandas Kg Rao,
Guruprasad Rao,
Vasudha Devi,
Yeshwant K. Rao,
Tarun Sen Gupta,
Bunmi S. MalauAduli
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
ajp advances in physiology education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.501
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1522-1229
pISSN - 1043-4046
DOI - 10.1152/advan.00093.2018
Subject(s) - formative assessment , curriculum , mathematics education , medical education , curriculum based measurement , assessment for learning , computer science , psychology , curriculum development , engineering ethics , pedagogy , curriculum mapping , medicine , engineering
A needs analysis study for curriculum reform in basic sciences was conducted at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India, by means of a formative assessment method, namely Basic Science Retention Examination (BSRE). Students participated in a BSRE, which comprised recall and clinical multiple-choice questions in six discipline areas. They also rated the clinical relevance of each question and provided responses to three open-text questions about the exam. Pass rates were determined; clinical relevance ratings and performance scores were compared between recall type and clinical questions to test students' level of clinical application of basic science knowledge. Text comments were thematically analyzed to identify recurring themes. Only one-third of students passed the BSRE (32.2%). Students performed better in recall questions compared with clinical questions in anatomy (51.0 vs. 40.2%), pathology (45.1 vs. 38.1%), pharmacology (41.8 vs. 31.7%), and biochemistry (43.5 vs. 26.9%). In physiology, students performed better in clinical questions compared with the recall type (56.2 vs. 45.8%). Students' response to BSRE was positive. The findings imply that transfer of basic science knowledge was poor, and that assessment methods should emphasize clinical application of basic science knowledge.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom