z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Water Transport and PEFC Performance with Different Interface Structure between Micro-Porous Layer and Catalyst Layer
Author(s) -
Yusuke Aoyama,
Kengo Suzuki,
Yutaka Tabe,
Takemi Chikahisa,
Toshihiro Tanuma
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of the electrochemical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.258
H-Index - 271
eISSN - 1945-7111
pISSN - 0013-4651
DOI - 10.1149/2.0451605jes
Subject(s) - electrode , porosity , membrane electrode assembly , diffusion , catalysis , chemical engineering , layer (electronics) , membrane , materials science , water transport , interface (matter) , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , chromatography , composite material , water flow , thermodynamics , environmental engineering , environmental science , contact angle , organic chemistry , biochemistry , physics , sessile drop technique , engineering , electrolyte
For interfaces between micro-porous layers (MPL) and catalyst layers (CL) made by the gas diffusion electrode (GDE) method, a seamless interface without gaps, shows better performance than that of cells with an interface made by the decal transfer method. With the decal transfer method, the MPL is simply hot-pressed to the CL-membrane assembly. This study investigates the effect of interface structure on cell performance and water transport in the MPL. Water distribution in cross sections of multiple layers were observed by a freezing method, where the cell is cooled below freezing temperature in short time and the water was observed in ice form by Cryo-SEM. The results show that a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) using the GDE method improves cell performance at high current densities. Direct observations by the freezing method and cryo-SEM show that there is no water accumulation at the MPL/CL interface made by the GDE method, while water accumulates at the interface made by the decal method. Other observations show that the water amount inside the MPL increases similarly in the two types of MEA when lowering the temperature, and the difference between the two types of MEA was only the water amount in the interface

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom