z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Comparison of LSM, LSF, and LSCo for Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Anodes
Author(s) -
Wensheng Wang,
Yingyi Huang,
Sukwon Jung,
John M. Vohs,
Raymond J. Gorte
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of the electrochemical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.258
H-Index - 271
eISSN - 1945-7111
pISSN - 0013-4651
DOI - 10.1149/1.2345583
Subject(s) - yttria stabilized zirconia , electrolysis , materials science , anode , electrolyte , electrode , oxide , solid oxide fuel cell , polarization (electrochemistry) , cathode , cubic zirconia , chemical engineering , composite material , metallurgy , ceramic , chemistry , engineering
Composite electrodes of yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) with La 0.8 Sr 0.2 MnO 3 (LSM), La 0.8 Sr 0.2 FeO 3 (LSF), and La 0.8 Sr 0.2 CoO 3 (LSCo) were prepared and tested as solid oxide electrolyzer (SOE) anodes and solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) cathodes at 973 K, using cells with a YSZ electrolyte and a Co-ceria-YSZ counter electrode. The LSM-YSZ electrode was activated by cathodic polarization but the enhanced performance was found to be unstable during electrolysis, with the electrode impedance increasing to near its unenhanced state after 24 h. LSF-YSZ and LSCo-YSZ electrodes exhibited a nearly constant impedance, independent of current density, during both SOE and SOFC operation. The performance of an LSF-YSZ composite for electrolysis current densities above 200 mA/cm 2 was unaffected by changing the O 2 partial pressure from ∼10 -2 to 1 atm, while the lower O 2 pressure harmed the performance of the LSCo-YSZ composite. The implications of these results for the characterization and optimization of SOE anodes is discussed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom