Reduced expression of cytokeratin 4 and 13 is a valuable marker for histologic grading of esophageal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia.
Author(s) -
Masaki Takashima,
Hiroshi Kawachi,
Tsukasa Yamaguchi,
Yutaka Nakajima,
Keisuke Kitagaki,
Masaki Sekine,
Tadatsune Iida,
Kosuke Takemura,
Tatsuyuki Kawano,
Yoshinobu Eishi
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of medical and dental sciences
Language(s) - English
DOI - 10.11480/jmds.590103
Histologic evaluation of low-grade or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LG-IN or HG-IN) of the esophagus is important for estimating the risk of progression to invasive carcinoma. Discrimination between LG-IN and HG-IN, or neoplasia and non-neoplastic lesion (NNL), however, is occasionally difficult. This study was designed to evaluate whether cytokeratin expression can be used for discrimination of these lesions. Esophageal Iodine-unstained lesions (n=154), less than 10 mm, were classified into HG-IN, LG-IN, and NNL. These lesions together with 154 foci of normal esophageal epithelium (NEE) were examined by immunohistochemistry for cytokeratins (CK4 and CK13), p53 overexpression, and the MIB-1 labeling index. The ratios of CK4- and CK13-positive staining were scored from 1 to 3. The CK4- and CK13-positive staining ratios were decreased in NNL (73% and 78%), LG-IN (55% and 69%), and HG-IN (33% and 48%), compared to NEE (91% and 95%). The differences between LG-IN and HG-IN, neoplasia and NNL, and among these three lesions and NEE were statistically significant (p < 0.005). The cytokeratin scores correlated with the MIB-1 labeling index (both: p < 0.0001), but not with p53 overexpression. CK4 and CK13 immunohistochemistry could be an objective method for evaluating the risk for progression to invasive carcinoma.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom