English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to investigate the dynamic retentive force of a mandibular unilateral distal-extension partial denture framework with a back-action clasp that was designed in a buccally tilted cast on a dental surveyor. The retention mechanism of this framework was analyzed in comparison with other typical unilateral and bilateral frameworks for the mandibular Kennedy class II case.MATERIALS AND METHODSExperimental gold alloy frameworks of three designs were repositioned to the master cast, and lifted upward to the vertical direction to the occlusal plane. The load required to dislodge each framework was recorded. The retentive force of each framework was determined by the maximum load in a dislodgment cycle. The bending strength of a plain clasp pattern of the same length as the clasp arm used in each framework was also measured by cantilever beam test.RESULTSThe mean retentive force of the unilateral framework with a back-action clasp of relatively low bending strength was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than that of the unilateral framework with two Akers clasps of relatively high bending strength, and 70 to 80% of the bilateral framework with two Akers clasps on the edentulous side and a double Akers clasp on the contralateral side. The unilateral framework with a back-action clasp showed the greatest early load resistance in the dislodgment cycle among the three designs.CONCLUSIONThe reasonable retention mechanism was demonstrated by the unilateral framework with a back-action clasp.

Dynamic retentive force of a mandibular unilateral removable partial denture framework with a back-action clasp.