z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Quality Initiatives: Improving Patient Flow for a Bone Densitometry Practice: Results from a Mayo Clinic Radiology Quality Initiative
Author(s) -
Kenneth T. Aakre,
Timothy B Valley,
Michael K. O’Connor
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
radiographics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.866
H-Index - 172
eISSN - 1527-1323
pISSN - 0271-5333
DOI - 10.1148/rg.302095735
Subject(s) - medicine , value stream mapping , lean six sigma , six sigma , quality management , dmaic , operations management , process (computing) , medical physics , lean manufacturing , quality (philosophy) , patient safety , health care , process management , computer science , management system , philosophy , business , epistemology , economics , economic growth , operating system
Lean Six Sigma process improvement methodologies have been used in manufacturing for some time. However, Lean Six Sigma process improvement methodologies also are applicable to radiology as a way to identify opportunities for improvement in patient care delivery settings. A multidisciplinary team of physicians and staff conducted a 100-day quality improvement project with the guidance of a quality advisor. By using the framework of DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve, and control), time studies were performed for all aspects of patient and technologist involvement. From these studies, value stream maps for the current state and for the future were developed, and tests of change were implemented. Comprehensive value stream maps showed that before implementation of process changes, an average time of 20.95 minutes was required for completion of a bone densitometry study. Two process changes (ie, tests of change) were undertaken. First, the location for completion of a patient assessment form was moved from inside the imaging room to the waiting area, enabling patients to complete the form while waiting for the technologist. Second, the patient was instructed to sit in a waiting area immediately outside the imaging rooms, rather than in the main reception area, which is far removed from the imaging area. Realignment of these process steps, with reduced technologist travel distances, resulted in a 3-minute average decrease in the patient cycle time. This represented a 15% reduction in the initial patient cycle time with no change in staff or costs. Radiology process improvement projects can yield positive results despite small incremental changes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here