
Imaging of Pelvic Malignancies with In-Line FDG PET–CT: Case Examples and Common Pitfalls of FDG PET
Author(s) -
Naveen Subhas,
Pavni Patel,
Harpreet K. Pannu,
Heather A. Jacene,
Elliot K. Fishman,
Richard L. Wahl
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
radiographics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.866
H-Index - 172
eISSN - 1527-1323
pISSN - 0271-5333
DOI - 10.1148/rg.254045155
Subject(s) - medicine , positron emission tomography , lymphoma , pet ct , endometrial cancer , radiology , ovarian cancer , colorectal cancer , cancer , positron emission tomography computed tomography , cervical cancer , nuclear medicine , pathology
The role of 2-[fluorine 18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of pelvic malignancies has been rapidly growing in recent years. FDG PET has proved to be valuable in the evaluation of a variety of pelvic malignancies, including colorectal cancer, uterine cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, a number of pitfalls are commonly encountered at FDG PET, including normal physiologic activity in bowel, ovaries, endometrium, and blood vessels and focal retained activity in ureters, bladder diverticula, pelvic kidneys, and urinary diversions. The use of an in-line FDG PET-CT system, with special attention given to proper patient preparation and scanning protocol, often provides valuable information to help localize and define disease and avoid potential diagnostic pitfalls.