Interpretation of Digital Mammograms: Comparison of Speed and Accuracy of Soft-Copy versus Printed-Film Display | Zendy

Etta D. Pisano | Zendy; Elodia B. Cole | Zendy; Emily O. Kistner | Zendy; Keith E. Muller | Zendy; Bradley M. Hemminger | Zendy; Mary Brown | Zendy; Richard Johnston | Zendy; Cherie M. Kuzmiak | Zendy; M. Patricia Braeuning | Zendy; Rita I. Freimanis | Zendy; Mary Scott Soo | Zendy; Jay A. Baker | Zendy; Ruth Walsh | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Interpretation of Digital Mammograms: Comparison of Speed and Accuracy of Soft-Copy versus Printed-Film Display

Author(s) -

Etta D. Pisano,

Elodia B. Cole,

Emily O. Kistner,

Keith E. Muller,

Bradley M. Hemminger,

Mary Brown,

Richard Johnston,

Cherie M. Kuzmiak,

M. Patricia Braeuning,

Rita I. Freimanis,

Mary Scott Soo,

Jay A. Baker,

Ruth Walsh

Publication year - 2002

Publication title -

radiology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.118

H-Index - 295

eISSN - 1527-1315

pISSN - 0033-8419

DOI - 10.1148/radiol.2232010704

Subject(s) - medicine , mammography , interpretation (philosophy) , receiver operating characteristic , biopsy , sensitivity (control systems) , diagnostic accuracy , soft tissue , significant difference , digital mammography , radiology , nuclear medicine , breast cancer , computer science , cancer , electronic engineering , engineering , programming language

To compare the speed and accuracy of the interpretations of digital mammograms by radiologists by using printed-film versus soft-copy display.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research