How Relevance Feedback is Framed Affects User Experience, but not Behaviour
Author(s) -
Dhruv Tripathi,
Alan Medlar,
Dorota Głowacka
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
helda (university of helsinki)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
ISBN - 978-1-4503-6025-8
DOI - 10.1145/3295750.3298957
Subject(s) - relevance (law) , relevance feedback , human–computer interaction , computer science , user experience design , artificial intelligence , political science , law , image (mathematics) , image retrieval
Retrieval systems based on machine learning require both positive and negative examples to perform inference, which is usually obtained through relevance feedback. Unfortunately, explicit negative relevance feedback is thought to have poor user experience. Instead, systems typically rely on implicit negative feedback. In this study, we confirm that, in the case of binary relevance feedback, users prefer giving positive feedback (and implicit negative feedback) over negative feedback (and implicit positive feedback). These two feedback mechanisms are functionally equivalent, capturing the same information from the user, but differ in how they are framed. Despite users' preference for positive feedback, there were no significant differences in behaviour. As users were not shown how feedback influenced search results, we hypothesise that previously reported results could, at least in part, be due to cognitive biases related to user perception of negative feedback.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom