z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Multiobjectivization with NSGA-ii on the noiseless BBOB testbed
Author(s) -
Thanh-Do Tran,
Dimo Brockhoff,
Bilel Derbel
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
hal (le centre pour la communication scientifique directe)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.1145/2464576.2482700
Subject(s) - testbed , benchmark (surveying) , computer science , mathematical optimization , operator (biology) , population , mutation , algorithm , mathematics , computer network , biochemistry , chemistry , demography , geodesy , repressor , sociology , transcription factor , gene , geography
The idea of multiobjectivization is to reformulate a single-objective problem as a multiobjective one. In one of the scarce studies proposing this idea for problems in continuous domains, the distance to the closest neighbor (DCN) in the population of a multiobjective algorithm has been used as the additional (dynamic) second objective. As no comparison with other state-of-the-art single-objective optimizers has been presented for this idea, we have benchmarked two variants (with and without the second DCN objective) of the original NSGA-II algorithm using two different mutation operators on the noiseless BBOB'2013 testbed. It turns out that multiobjectivization helps for several of the 24 benchmark functions, but that, compared to the best algorithms from BBOB'2009, a significant performance loss is visible. Moreover, on some functions, the choice of the mutation operator has a stronger impact on the performance than whether multiobjectivization is employed or not.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom