Perturbative or Path-Integral Approach versus Operator-Formalism Approach
Author(s) -
M. Abe,
N. Nakanishi
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
progress of theoretical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1347-4081
pISSN - 0033-068X
DOI - 10.1143/ptp.102.1187
Subject(s) - path integral formulation , physics , formalism (music) , feynman diagram , quantum field theory , mathematical physics , operator product expansion , operator (biology) , gauge theory , conformal map , theoretical physics , quantum , quantum electrodynamics , quantum mechanics , mathematical analysis , mathematics , art , musical , biochemistry , chemistry , repressor , gene , transcription factor , visual arts
In the conformal-gauge two-dimensional quantum gravity, the solution obtained by the perturbative or path-integral approach is compared with the one obtained by the operator-formalism approach. Treatments of the anomaly problem in both approaches are different. This difference is found to be essentially caused by the fact that the perturbative or path-integral approach is based on the T*-product (covariantized T-product), which generally violates field equations. Indeed, this fact induces some extra one-loop Feynman diagrams, which would not exist unless a nonzero contribution arose from a zero field. Some demerits of the path-integral approach are explicitly demonstrated
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom