z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Modeling soil cation concentration and sodium adsorption ratio using observed diffuse reflectance spectra
Author(s) -
Zhen-zhen Xiao,
Yi Li,
Hao Feng
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
canadian journal of soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.592
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1918-1841
pISSN - 0008-4271
DOI - 10.1139/cjss-2016-0002
Subject(s) - partial least squares regression , calibration , support vector machine , linear regression , logarithm , sodium adsorption ratio , cross validation , chemistry , mathematics , stepwise regression , analytical chemistry (journal) , biological system , artificial intelligence , statistics , chromatography , computer science , mathematical analysis , ecology , drip irrigation , irrigation , biology
Spectral analysis is a useful tool for the rapid and accurate prediction of soil properties. Our objective is to select the best model for predicting the three soil cation concentrations ([Na+], [Mg2+], and [Ca2+]) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). Three methods were applied, i.e., stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR), partial least-squares regression (PLSR), and support vector machine (SVM). Estimation models for four soil properties were developed using three different spectral processing and transformation techniques, i.e., reflectance (Re), logarithm of reciprocal Re (LR), and standard normal variable of Re (SNV) were used. A total of 36 models were established. Of these, 27 models for [Na+], [Mg2+], and [Ca2+] were not applicable for subsequent prediction, because the coefficients of determination (R2) were not high (0.224–0.689), and their relative percent deviations (RPD) were all smaller than the 1.4 threshold. However, the models for SAR∼R using PLSR (R2=0.728 for calibration and 0.661 for validation, RPD=1.43), SAR∼LR using SVM (R2=0.791 for calibration and 0.712 for validation, RPD=1.81), and SAR∼SNV using SVM (R2=0.878 for calibration and 0.814 for validation, RPD=2.13) were valid for further prediction. Finally, SAR∼SNV using SVM was selected as the best model. There are intrinsic factors resulting in an unsatisfied model performance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom