Rock quality designation (RQD): time to rest in peace
Author(s) -
P. J. N. Pells,
Z.T. Bieniawski,
S. R. Hencher,
Steven E. Pells
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
canadian geotechnical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.032
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1208-6010
pISSN - 0008-3674
DOI - 10.1139/cgj-2016-0012
Subject(s) - rock mass classification , rock mass rating , geology , rock mechanics , geological strength index , geotechnical engineering , chart , excavation , mining engineering , statistics , mathematics
Rock quality designation (RQD) was introduced by Don Deere in the mid-1960s as a means of using diamond core to classify rock for engineering purposes. Subsequently, it was incorporated into the rock mass rating (RMR) and Q-system classification methods that, worldwide, now play substantial roles in rock mechanics design, whether for tunnels, foundations, rock slopes or rock excavation. It is shown that a key facet of the definition of RQD is ignored in many parts of the world, and it is noted that there are several inherent limitations to the use of RQD. Based on mapping of rock formations by 17 independent professionals at different locations in Australia and South Africa, it is shown that differences in assessed RQD values result in significant errors in computed RMR and Q ratings, and also in geological strength index (GSI) and mining rock mass rating (MRMR). The introduction of a look-up chart for assessing GSI has effectively removed the need to measure, or estimate, RQD. It has been found that GSI ...
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom