English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Study sample Power calculations were used to determine the sample size. A 1300-patient sample would demonstrate a 10% absolute difference (0.01 significance, 90% power), and have an evens chance of identifying a 5% difference at the 0.05 significance level. A total of 1,307 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. A total of 654 patients were randomly included in the intervention group, and 653 were randomly allocated to the control group.

Cost effectiveness of a prize draw on response to a postal questionnaire: results of a randomised trial among orthopaedic outpatients in Edinburgh.