z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities
Author(s) -
Ben-Tzion Karsh,
Matthew B. Weinger,
Patricia Abbott,
Robert L. Wears
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of the american medical informatics association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.614
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-974X
pISSN - 1067-5027
DOI - 10.1136/jamia.2010.005637
Subject(s) - software deployment , health information technology , health care , quality (philosophy) , cognition , information technology , computer science , risk analysis (engineering) , data science , psychology , knowledge management , engineering ethics , medicine , political science , engineering , psychiatry , epistemology , philosophy , law , operating system
Current research suggests that the rate of adoption of health information technology (HIT) is low, and that HIT may not have the touted beneficial effects on quality of care or costs. The twin issues of the failure of HIT adoption and of HIT efficacy stem primarily from a series of fallacies about HIT. We discuss 12 HIT fallacies and their implications for design and implementation. These fallacies must be understood and addressed for HIT to yield better results. Foundational cognitive and human factors engineering research and development are essential to better inform HIT development, deployment, and use.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom