Automated Evidence-based Critiquing of Orders for Abdominal Radiographs: Impact on Utilization and Appropriateness | Zendy

Linda H. Harpole | Zendy; Ramin Khorasani | Zendy; Julie Fiskio | Zendy; Gilad J. Kuperman | Zendy; David W. Bates | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Automated Evidence-based Critiquing of Orders for Abdominal Radiographs: Impact on Utilization and Appropriateness

Author(s) -

Linda H. Harpole,

Ramin Khorasani,

Julie Fiskio,

Gilad J. Kuperman,

David W. Bates

Publication year - 1997

Publication title -

journal of the american medical informatics association

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.614

H-Index - 150

eISSN - 1527-974X

pISSN - 1067-5027

DOI - 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040511

Subject(s) - medicine , phase (matter) , interpretation (philosophy) , randomized controlled trial , appropriateness criteria , medical physics , radiology , surgery , computer science , chemistry , organic chemistry , programming language

Inappropriate utilization of diagnostic testing has been well documented. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of presenting real time, evidence-based critiques about the appropriateness of abdominal radiograph (KUB) orders on physician decision making.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research